分享关於口交资料

Big_daddy · 发表于 2012-10-14 21:13:17

!! 分享一篇刚找的资料
是一位新加坡的医生网上发表的关於口交的文章

内容如下! 供鉴定参考
Getting HIV from Oral Sex
Posted by drtan on Oct 28, 2011 in HIV Test in Asia, Men's Health | 385 comments
This is one of the most common causes of worry I’ve come across.

Before getting down to answering this questions proper, we have to understand something about how medical ‘truths’ are determined. We can all appreciate that medicine is never black and white. And almost nothing is 100% certain. Medical knowledge is gained from scientific study and statistical analysis. Once something is termed ‘statistically significant’ we generally tend to accept it as truth or fact. However, it also means that a small but definite number or people will fall outside of this ‘statistically significant’ majority.

Also, it is often very challenging if not downright impossible to conduct scientific studies of enough quality and depth to reach a conclusion. Take our topic for example; we want to find out if HIV can be transmitted via oral sex. The best thing we can do is round up a million HIV positive women from around the world, make them perform oral sex on a million HIV negative men and determine if any of the men caught HIV. Then do it all over again this time with a million HIV positive men and a million HIV negative women. Then do it all over again with men performing oral sex on men and again with women performing oral sex on women. Even if somehow we manage to conduct this impossible and ethically questionable experiment, and somehow the number of people who caught HIV was absolutely zero, one can always say ‘what if the one million and one person would have been the one to catch HIV?’

Conversely, if one person out of this million couples does contract HIV, then we would have to come to the conclusion that HIV can be transmitted by oral sex. Right? Wrong. We have to take into consideration the possibility that there was a confounding factor. For example maybe this person already had HIV but was in the window period and so happened to be diagnosed only after the experiment.

Which then opens up a whole Pandora’s box of ‘what ifs’. What if there was an ulcer on the lips? Ulcer on the gums? Sore throat? Cut on the lip? Dry cracked lip? A sore on the penis? Warts on the vulva? False negative HIV tests? False positive HIV test? Etc etc. The list is endless.

You can see now why it is virtually impossible to reach a definitive conclusion and make a statement as strong as ‘HIV cannot be transmitted by oral sex’. This then leads to all the great authorities on HIV, infectious disease and public health coming to the same conclusion. ‘There is a possibility HIV can be transmitted via oral sex but this is rare.’ This statement very nicely covers all possible legal loopholes. E.g. ‘you might get hit by an asteroid while walking in the park but this is rare.’

Mind you, although the experiment we talked about is impossible and morally reprehensible, scientists around the world have been trying very hard to gather data about the risk of HIV transmission via oral sex. They did this through complex questionnaires and very clever statistical analysis. But just like every experiment involving people, there are just too many confounders. E.g. people forget or miss out details of sexual activity, people rarely have oral sex alone, the HIV positive partner may already be on antiretroviral treatment which itself reduces transmission risk anyway etc etc

So at the end of the day, these scientific studies are still not able to make the statement ‘HIV cannot be transmitted via oral sex’. Again they come to the same conclusion which is ‘There is a risk of HIV transmission via oral sex but this risk is low to miniscule’. This also means you are never going to come across a doctor who would advise you NOT to have a HIV test because your exposure was ‘only oral sex’.

So if you are still worried about having caught HIV via oral sex please remember this one very important fact: YOUR RISK IS EXTREMELY LOW. And yes, this is regardless of the fact that you think you might have a small cut, small scratch, infected hair gland, mouth ulcer, bleeding gums etc etc

But LOW risk does not mean NO risk. You still need to get yourself tested. But I’m sure you’ll be OK.
Google 翻译版本 :
从口交感染艾滋病毒
张贴者drtan 2011年10月28日，在亚洲HIV测试，男性健康 | 385条评论
这是担心我遇到的最常见的原因之一。
在回答这个问题，正确的，我们要了解一些关于如何确定医疗的“真理”。我们都明白，药是从来没有黑色和白色。几乎没有什么是100％肯定的。医学知识的不断积累，从科学的研究和统计分析。一旦某样东西被称为“统计上显著”我们一般都倾向于接受它的真理或事实。然而，这也意味着小而明确的数量或将超出本“统计学意义”的大多数。
此外，它往往是非常具有挑战性的，如果不是完全不可能足够的质量和深度进行科学的研究，得出结论。例如把我们的主题，我们要找出如果艾滋病毒可以通过口交传播。我们所能做的最好的事情是圆的来自世界各地的一万艾滋病毒呈阳性的妇女，让他们上万元的HIV阴性的男性进行口交，并确定如果任何人抓住了HIV。然后做一遍这个时候有一百万HIV阳性的男性和万艾滋病毒阴性的妇女。然后做一遍，与男人进行口交对男性和对妇女进行口交的妇女。即使以某种方式管理进行这项不可能的，道德上可疑的实验，并以某种方式的人谁抓住了HIV是绝对的零数，总是可以说，如果一百万，一人已经感染艾滋病毒的人吗？“
相反，如果一个人出了这万对夫妇感染艾滋病毒，那么我们就来的结论是，艾滋病毒可通过口交。对吗？这是错误的。我们必须考虑到的可能性，有一个混杂因素。例如，也许这个人已经有艾滋病毒，但在窗口期，正巧被诊断后，才实验。
然后打开了一个潘多拉的盒子“如果”。在嘴唇上，如果有一个溃疡吗？牙龈溃疡？喉咙痛吗？剪下的唇吗？干裂的嘴唇吗？疼痛在阴茎上？疣外阴吗？假阴性爱滋病病毒抗体测试？假阳性艾滋病毒测试？等等等等，这份名单是无止境的。
现在你可以看到为什么这几乎是不可能达到一个明确的结论，并作出一份声明中强烈的艾滋病毒不会传染口交“。这就导致艾滋病毒的所有伟大的当局，传染病和公共健康的未来了同样的结论。 “有一种可能性，艾滋病毒可以通过口交传播，但这是罕见的。” 这条语句很好地涵盖了所有可能的法律漏洞。例如，“你可能会被打的小行星在公园里散步时，但这是罕见的。”
提醒你，虽然我们谈论的实验是不可能的，不道德的，世界各地的科学家已经很努力收集数据通过口交感染艾滋病毒传播的风险。他们这样做是通过复杂的问卷调查和非常聪明的统计分析。但就像每一个实验的人，有太多的干扰因素。比如人们忘记或错过了细节性活动，人们很少有单独口交，艾滋病毒呈阳性的合作伙伴可能已经接受抗逆转录病毒治疗，这本身就降低传播风险，反正等等
因此，在一天结束的时候，这些科学的研究，但仍无法使语句的艾滋病毒不能被传送通过口交“。他们再次得出了同样的结论，这是通过口交感染艾滋病毒传播的风险，但这种风险是低到微乎其微“。这也意味着你永远不会遇到一个医生会劝你不要有一个艾滋病毒检测，因为你的曝光是“口交”。
所以，如果你还是担心被捉住通过口交感染艾滋病毒，请记住这一个非常重要的事实：你的风险是非常低的。是的，这是不管的事实，你认为你可能有一个小切口，小划痕，感染头发腺，口腔溃疡，牙龈出血等等
但低风险不等于没有风险。你仍然需要自己测试。但我敢肯定，你会没事的。

另外查过这位应该是新加坡的有效注册医院，因为在官方名单有他的资料，名望不清楚!

注意是: gov.sg
谢谢